This topic has probably been covered, but opinions may have changed. Do you guys prefer ball end or loop end strings? I've only ever tried ball end (Argie 11s). Maybe loop end is the tradition? I notice Michael has many of the guitars that are for sale set up with ball ends. Interesting that SelMac style tailpieces will take both. I'm tempted to go loopy on my next string order (oh the thrill of it). Anyway thought I'd ask for opionions (must be Friday).
Swang on,
Comments
First, I prefer Argentine loop ends for a 10 set and D' Addario ball ends for an 11 gauge set. One reason is that the gauges on the wound strings are closer between the argentine 10s and the D'Addario 11s so they don't represent a big adjustment to get used to.
Second is that ball end strings that have the silk wrap are a real pain to thread through the bridge holes. Especially the low E string because its just too thick.
Best
Let me explain; When i change argies (don't like galli's) i put the guitar between my feet, hold the tension on the string with one hand (pulling it away from the top) and turn the peg with the other hand. Thus ensuring the closest tightest winding, which reduces the possibility of the string breaking at the tuner and gives better resolution in tuning the string to pitch later on. When i use loop ends I can't do this as the damn loop keeps popping off the tail piece as i execute my fool proof plan.
Summary: Balls, Anal
Just received a bunch of loo-end Argentine 11's from Michael in the mail today (been using Galli 11's cause of the pre-mature breakage I have with the Argentine g and d strings, but I like the feel of the Argentine cause of the round core, and being able to buy bulk single strings takes care of the problem).
There doesn't seem to be any reason to go with ball-end, IMO.
In any case, every string start its life as a loop end.
Swang on,